AI-Powered Compliance Analysis Suite
AI-driven solution to navigate complex regulatory compliance landscapes, offering automated analysis and recommendations for compliance management.
In scope
- Automated compliance monitoring
- Regulatory change tracking
- Risk assessment automation
- Control effectiveness analysis
- Compliance gap identification
You receive
- Monthly compliance reports
- Real-time compliance dashboard
- Automated alerts and notifications
- Remediation recommendations
- Compliance metrics and KPIs
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Single Framework License
$3.5K / mo
Monthly subscription covering 1 regulatory framework: automated control monitoring, gap identification, control-effectiveness analysis and regulatory change tracking for that framework, with dashboard, alerts and one monthly report.
- frameworks
- 1
- 1 framework monitored
- Compliance dashboard and automated alerts
- Monthly compliance report with KPIs
- Remediation recommendations for identified gaps
- Regulatory change tracking for that framework
- — Second or further frameworks
- — Cross-framework control mapping
- — Audit or certification fees and auditor liaison
- — Hands-on remediation of gaps
Multi-Framework License
$7.5K / mo
Monthly subscription covering up to 3 regulatory frameworks, with shared controls mapped across them so one piece of evidence is analysed once. Dashboard, alerts and a monthly report per framework plus a consolidated gap list.
- frameworks
- 3
- Up to 3 frameworks monitored
- Cross-framework control mapping
- Consolidated gap and remediation list
- Monthly report per framework
- Regulatory change tracking across all 3
- — Fourth or further frameworks
- — Custom or internal control frameworks
- — Audit or certification fees
- — Hands-on remediation of gaps
Unlimited Framework License
$15K / mo
Monthly subscription with no fixed cap on frameworks; the framework list is scoped at onboarding and can be extended during the term. Adds custom or internal control sets mapped alongside the regulatory frameworks, and a consolidated monthly report.
- No fixed framework cap, scoped at onboarding
- Custom and internal control frameworks
- Cross-framework control mapping
- Consolidated monthly report and KPIs
- New frameworks added during the term
- — Audit or certification fees
- — Hands-on remediation of gaps
- — Acting as the named compliance officer
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a advisory & fractional leadership engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Onboarding & baseline
Current program, risks, commitments and stakeholders reviewed.
You see · Access to leadership and existing documents.
02Priorities & roadmap
A risk-ranked roadmap agreed with leadership.
You see · Decisions on priorities and budget.
03Ongoing cadence
Regular working sessions, decisions and deliverables to the agreed scope.
You see · A named advisor and a standing rhythm.
04Reporting to leadership
Board and executive reporting in business terms.
You see · Board-ready updates.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Non-Human & Machine Identity Security
Assess and govern non-human identities — secrets, API keys, service accounts, workload identities, and AI agent identities — covering issuance, rotation, least-privilege, and lifecycle.
Zero Trust Security Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's zero trust architecture implementation, examining identity verification, network segmentation, and access controls. Our assessment identifies gaps in your zero trust strategy and provides a roadmap for enhancing security beyond traditional perimeter-based approaches.
CISO Comprehensive Security Assessment
Holistic evaluation of your organization's entire security program across all critical domains. This efficient, structured assessment provides CISOs and security leaders with a complete diagnostic of security capabilities, maturity gaps, and prioritized improvement opportunities. Our comprehensive approach delivers actionable insights across governance, technical controls, and operational security to inform strategic decision-making and resource allocation.
Research
Latest from the blog
compliance · Sep 12, 2026
The EU AI Act's Hidden Breach Clock: Why Article 73 Needs Its Own Line in Your IR Runbook
Article 73 of the EU AI Act imposes a 2/10/15-day serious-incident reporting clock that survived the Digital Omnibus's delay of the rest of the high-risk regime, and it does not map cleanly onto GDPR, CRA or NIS2 deadlines.
cloud-security · Sep 6, 2026
GPUThor and the Unpatchable Layer: When Your AI Infrastructure Risk Is Silicon, Not Software
University of Toronto researchers demonstrated a Rowhammer attack that defeats on-die ECC on NVIDIA workstation GPUs and reaches host root in about 1.1 minutes, down from roughly 22 hours. No software patch is possible, and the proof of concept is scheduled for November 15. Paired with NVIDIA's NemoClaw DNS-rebinding flaw, it defines the hardware boundary of AI infrastructure risk.
compliance · Sep 4, 2026
Seven Days to a 24-Hour Clock: EU Cyber Resilience Act Article 14 Reporting Starts September 11
On September 11, 2026, manufacturers of connected products sold into the EU must report actively exploited vulnerabilities to ENISA within 24 hours. Penalties reach EUR 15 million or 2.5% of global turnover. The engineering requirements that would make products defensible do not apply until December 2027 — a 15-month window in which you must disclose fast against products built to the old standard.
Start an engagement