AI-SOC / Managed Agentic Security Services (MASS)
An AI-native managed detection & response service: AI agents handle triage/investigation with identity + business context, human threat hunters and responders own escalation and response — beyond traditional MDR.
In scope
- AI-assisted alert triage & investigation
- Identity + business-context enrichment
- Human-led threat hunting
- Incident response & containment
- Detection engineering
You receive
- Managed AI-SOC service
- Monthly detection/response reports
- Threat hunt findings
- IR coordination
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential
Scoped
Core AI-SOC monitoring + triage
- devices
- 500
- Users
- 500
- — Human-led threat hunting
- — Incident response and containment actions
- — Custom detection engineering
Advanced
Scoped
Full MASS with human hunters + IR
- devices
- 2500
- Users
- 2500
- — Dedicated analyst pod
- — On-site incident response and forensics
- — Security tooling licences
Enterprise
Scoped
Enterprise AI-SOC with dedicated pod + 24/7
- — Security tooling and data platform licences
- — Legal, PR and breach notification services
- — On-site forensics beyond the agreed IR scope
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a incident response readiness engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Current-state review
Plans, playbooks, contacts, logging and insurance requirements reviewed.
You see · Your IR plan and insurance policy.
02Scenario design
Scenarios chosen for your threat profile: ransomware, BEC, insider, cloud compromise.
You see · Participant list and scenario sign-off.
03Exercise / readiness work
Tabletop facilitation or readiness build-out, depending on the service.
You see · Your team's time in the room.
04After-action report
Gaps found, decisions that stalled, and an improvement plan with owners.
You see · A report your board and insurer can read.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Incident Response Readiness & Tabletop Exercise
Comprehensive incident response assessment and tabletop exercise designed to validate your organization's IR preparedness through focused policy review, stakeholder coordination validation, and scenario-based team exercises. Our specialized approach combines industry-standard IR maturity assessment with practical tabletop simulations to enhance your incident response capabilities, team coordination, and regulatory compliance readiness.
SOC Maturity & Incident Response Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's Security Operations Center (SOC) capabilities and incident response readiness. Our assessment examines detection coverage, response procedures, team capabilities, and technology effectiveness to identify gaps in your security operations and provide a roadmap for enhanced threat detection and response capabilities.
Advanced Threat Hunting Program
Proactive threat hunting service combining machine learning, behavioral analytics, and expert analysis to identify sophisticated threats and establish continuous hunting capabilities.
Research
Latest from the blog
ai-security · Sep 16, 2026
Should OpenAI Face Computer Fraud Charges? Why Liability Runs Through Contracts, Not Hacking Law
Cable panels asked if Sam Altman should be tried for computer fraud. The real liability fight is over negligence, contract terms, and disclosure duties -- and CISOs need to update vendor paper now.
ai-security · Sep 5, 2026
Excessive Agency Moved to #3: What the 2026 OWASP LLM Top 10 and the Agent Control Standard Change For Your Program
The OWASP GenAI Security Project's 2026 list weighted 6,639 real incidents against expert consensus, and the largest movement on it was Excessive Agency climbing from #6 to #3. Alongside it shipped the Agent Control Standard v0.1, which defines agent governance through OpenTelemetry and OCSF tracing. The ranking is a lagging indicator finally catching up to what is actually breaking.
application-security · Sep 3, 2026
GitSpawn: Cloning a Repository Is Now Code Execution, and Four of Eight Findings Are Still Unpatched
Manifold Security disclosed a vulnerability class where a malicious .git/config file executes attacker commands the moment an AI coding agent runs a routine Git operation — no sandbox, no approval prompt, full developer privileges. Eight findings across seven agents including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and Goose. As of the September 1 retest, four remained unpatched.
Start an engagement