Critical Infrastructure Protection Program
Comprehensive security program for critical infrastructure protection, including water systems, emergency services, and essential facility security.
In scope
- Water system security
- Emergency services protection
- Essential facility assessment
- Infrastructure interdependency analysis
- Physical security integration
You receive
- Infrastructure security architecture
- Protection framework
- Interdependency analysis
- Risk mitigation strategy
- Emergency response procedures
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Core Infrastructure Protection Assessment
$90K
Assessment of one site, covering the IT network and the boundary with the operational network.
- Sites
- 1
- One site
- IT and boundary review
- Risk register
- — Hands-on testing of operational equipment
- — More than one site
Advanced Infrastructure Protection Program
$155K
Up to 3 sites, including passive review of the operational network.
- Sites
- 3
- Up to three sites
- Passive operational network review
- — Active testing of live operational equipment
Enterprise Infrastructure Protection Solution
$240K
Up to 6 sites with a protection program roadmap; larger estates are scoped at kickoff.
- Sites
- 6
- Up to six sites
- Program roadmap
- Executive readout
- — Implementation work
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Red Team Subscription
A standing offensive testing program in place of a once-a-year engagement. Each month our team runs a targeted assessment against an agreed part of your environment; each quarter a scenario-based attack tests how well your people and tooling detect and respond. The Premium tier adds two full red team engagements a year. Findings from every cycle feed one running improvement plan, so each round also checks whether the last round's fixes held. Targets, rules of engagement and testing windows are agreed at kickoff.
AI & Agentic Red Team
Offensive testing of LLMs and AI agents — prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse, agent goal hijack, memory/context poisoning, model extraction, and agent identity abuse. Mapped to OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS.
AI/ML Security Assessment
Expert evaluation of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems security, from model development to deployment. Our assessment identifies vulnerabilities in AI/ML infrastructure, examines risks of data poisoning, adversarial attacks, and model manipulation while providing guidance for securing these advanced technologies.
Research
Latest from the blog
cloud-security · Sep 6, 2026
GPUThor and the Unpatchable Layer: When Your AI Infrastructure Risk Is Silicon, Not Software
University of Toronto researchers demonstrated a Rowhammer attack that defeats on-die ECC on NVIDIA workstation GPUs and reaches host root in about 1.1 minutes, down from roughly 22 hours. No software patch is possible, and the proof of concept is scheduled for November 15. Paired with NVIDIA's NemoClaw DNS-rebinding flaw, it defines the hardware boundary of AI infrastructure risk.
operations · Aug 25, 2026
A Tale of Two SOCs: CISA Ran the Same Attack Against Two Organizations. One Caught It in Two Minutes. One Never Saw It.
CISA advisory AA26-237A, published August 25, 2026, documents red team assessments against two critical infrastructure organizations using comparable tradecraft. Organization B isolated hosts in 2 to 20 minutes. Organization A was fully compromised — domain, cloud, and the security team's own communications — and detected nothing. CISA attributes the gap to people and process, not tooling. That finding should change how you spend.
operations · Aug 24, 2026
"Not a Theoretical Risk": Five Agencies Confirm AI Is Writing the Exploits Hitting Siemens S7 PLCs
On August 19, 2026, NSA, CISA, FBI, DOE, and EPA issued joint advisory AA26-231A on active targeting of Siemens S7 PLCs across six critical infrastructure sectors. The technical novelty is not the exploit — S7comm has been weakly authenticated for years. It is that AI-assisted scripting has collapsed the OT expertise barrier that was doing most of the defending. Here is what changes and what to do about it.
Start an engagement