Dark Web & Credential Exposure Monitoring
Stolen credentials and infostealer logs are the most common way in. We monitor breach corpuses, infostealer markets, paste sites and criminal forums for your domains, executives and key vendors, validate what we find, and tell you what to reset and why — analyst-reviewed alerts rather than a raw feed.
In scope
- Domain and email credential exposure monitoring
- Infostealer log and session-cookie exposure
- Executive and VIP personal-email monitoring
- Criminal forum and marketplace mentions
- Analyst validation and response guidance
You receive
- Validated exposure alerts
- Monthly exposure report
- Password-reset and session-revocation guidance
- Quarterly threat briefing
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Exposure Monitoring
$500 / mo
One primary domain: credential and breach monitoring with monthly report
- domains
- 1
Advanced Exposure Monitoring
$1.5K / mo
Up to 5 domains plus 10 executives: adds infostealer and session exposure, forum mentions and 24-hour alerting
- domains
- 5
- subjects
- 10
Enterprise Exposure Monitoring
$4K / mo
Unlimited domains, key vendors and VIPs: adds takedown coordination, brand impersonation monitoring and analyst on call
- domains
- 50
- subjects
- 50
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a continuous / subscription service engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Onboarding
Scope, integrations, access and escalation paths set up.
You see · Access and contacts.
02Baseline
An initial assessment establishes where you are before continuous work starts.
You see · The baseline report.
03Continuous operation
The service runs to the agreed scope, with findings delivered as they are confirmed.
You see · Findings in the portal as they land.
04Periodic review
Regular reporting on trends, open items and what changed.
You see · A standing review with your team.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Domain Profiler (OSINT) External
Domain Profiler (OSINT) - External is a tool that provides a comprehensive footprint analysis of your domain, identifying exposed data and vulnerabilities across multiple public sources.
Healthcare & University OSINT Assessment
Sector-specific OSINT assessment focused on healthcare institutions and universities, providing exposure analysis and external threat mapping.
Mergers & Acquisitions OSINT Pre-Assessment
Provides critical pre-acquisition intelligence by assessing a target organizations public exposure, risks, and external footprint before finalizing M&A deals.
Research
Latest from the blog
supply-chain-security · Sep 2, 2026
Your MCP Servers Are Unreviewed Third-Party Code With Your Credentials: Deadbugz, Grafana, and the Registry Trust Gap
A malicious MCP server pushed through 23 GitHub pull requests in 74 minutes behaved normally for three calls, then rewrote its own instructions to exfiltrate SSH keys. Grafana's official MCP server accepted session IDs it never issued, at 1.9 million Docker pulls. MCP servers are third-party code running with your credentials, and almost nobody is governing them that way.
incident-response · Jul 4, 2026
The 95-Day Warning: Half of Ransomware Victims Had a Visible Credential Exposure Before the Attack
The 2026 Verizon DBIR found that 50% of ransomware victims had an infostealer infection or credential leak within roughly 95 days before the attack — and 73% within the prior year. That makes credential-exposure monitoring the closest thing the industry has to a ransomware smoke detector. Here is how the pipeline works, why most programs cannot see it, and how to build the detector.
threat-intelligence · Jul 3, 2026
The 2026 Verizon DBIR: The Year the Patching Regime Lost the Race — A CISO Briefing
For the first time in 19 years of the DBIR, vulnerability exploitation (31%) overtook stolen credentials as the top way attackers get in — while median time-to-patch worsened from 32 to 43 days and AI compressed exploit timelines to hours. Third parties now sit in 48% of breaches, shadow AI use tripled to 45% of employees, and 69% of ransomware victims refused to pay. Here is what the 2026 report actually changes in your program.
Start an engagement