Decentralized Identity Security Assessment
Expert evaluation of decentralized identity systems, focusing on security of DIDs, verifiable credentials, and identity protocols.
In scope
- Assessment of DID implementations
- credential issuance systems
- verification protocols
- privacy controls
You receive
- Security assessment report
- protocol analysis
- privacy evaluation
- implementation recommendations
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Core DID Security Assessment
$35K
One DID implementation: up to 1 repository and 1 API. Review of DID method handling, key management and resolution, with a security assessment report.
- repositories
- 1
- apis
- 1
- DID method and resolver security review
- Key management and rotation review
- Code review of 1 repository
- Security assessment report
- — Credential issuance and revocation review
- — Verification protocol analysis
- — Privacy evaluation
- — Implementation support
Advanced DID Security Program
$60K
Up to 3 repositories and 3 APIs: everything in the basic tier, credential issuance and revocation security, verification protocol analysis, and a privacy evaluation covering correlation and selective disclosure.
- repositories
- 3
- apis
- 3
- Everything in the basic tier
- Credential issuance and revocation security review
- Verification protocol analysis
- Privacy controls evaluation
- One fix-review round
- — Custom test tooling
- — Implementation support hours
- — On-chain contract audit beyond the 3 repositories
Enterprise DID Security Solution
$95K
Full-scope DID security program including custom tool development and implementation support
- repositories
- 5
- apis
- 5
- — Ongoing monitoring
- — Standards body or certification submissions
- — Building the identity system
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Blockchain Contact Analysis Service
In-depth analysis of blockchain contacts and transactions to trace asset movement, identify patterns, and assess security risks in cryptocurrency operations.
Quantum-Safe Cryptography Readiness
Future-proof your cryptographic infrastructure with quantum-safe algorithms and protocols. Includes assessment, migration planning, and implementation support.
Banking and Web3 Redundancy Assessment
Advanced assessment of banking and Web3 infrastructure focusing on redundancy, privacy, and security measures for cryptocurrency and traditional banking operations.
Research
Latest from the blog
incident-response · Sep 22, 2026
The Revolut Breach Is a Case Study in Confusing Authentication With Authorization
Revolut disclosed customer data to attackers who spoofed a government agency's email domain for five months. The root cause was not weak email security but a workflow that treated a valid domain as proof of a valid request.
identity-security · Aug 28, 2026
"No Customer Action Required": A CVSS 10.0 in Entra ID and the Disclosure Problem Nobody Has Solved
CVE-2026-69836 was a maximum-severity unauthenticated RCE in Microsoft Entra ID — the identity layer under a large share of the world's enterprises. Microsoft patched it, told customers to do nothing, and briefly flagged it as exploited before correcting the record on August 21. There was no action to take, no IOC to hunt, and no way to verify. That is the actual problem.
operations · Aug 25, 2026
A Tale of Two SOCs: CISA Ran the Same Attack Against Two Organizations. One Caught It in Two Minutes. One Never Saw It.
CISA advisory AA26-237A, published August 25, 2026, documents red team assessments against two critical infrastructure organizations using comparable tradecraft. Organization B isolated hosts in 2 to 20 minutes. Organization A was fully compromised — domain, cloud, and the security team's own communications — and detected nothing. CISA attributes the gap to people and process, not tooling. That finding should change how you spend.
Start an engagement