Election Systems Security Assessment
Specialized security assessment for election systems and voting infrastructure, including hardware testing, software evaluation, and process validation.
In scope
- Voting machine security testing
- Ballot processing system review
- Election management software assessment
- Results transmission security
- Audit log validation
You receive
- Election system security report
- Process validation documentation
- Technical security analysis
- Audit framework recommendations
- Security enhancement roadmap
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Core Election Systems Assessment
$65K
Assessment for 1 jurisdiction: up to 2 equipment models (limit 'devices' = distinct models), configuration review of the election management software, ballot processing review, audit log validation and process walkthroughs. No hardware teardown.
- devices
- 2
- Sites
- 1
- Security testing of up to 2 voting equipment models (external interfaces and configuration)
- Election management software configuration review
- Ballot processing system review
- Audit log validation
- Process validation documentation and security report
- — Hardware teardown and firmware extraction
- — Results transmission testing
- — Custom test tooling
- — Additional jurisdictions
Advanced Election Security Program
$110K
Up to 5 equipment models and up to 3 jurisdictions. Adds hardware-level testing (ports, storage media, firmware extraction), results transmission security testing, and process validation of every stage from ballot definition to canvass.
- devices
- 5
- Sites
- 3
- Hardware-level testing of up to 5 equipment models
- Results transmission security testing
- Election management software assessment
- End-to-end process validation for up to 3 jurisdictions
- Audit framework recommendations
- Security enhancement roadmap
- — Custom test harnesses and tooling
- — Whole-system validation across all components
- — Certification testing under any federal or state program
Enterprise Election Security Solution
$175K
Up to 10 equipment models and up to 10 jurisdictions, e.g. a statewide system. Adds custom test tooling built for the equipment in scope and validation of the whole system as deployed, including integrations between components.
- devices
- 10
- Sites
- 10
- Everything in the Advanced program, for up to 10 models
- Custom test tooling for the equipment in scope
- Whole-system validation including component integrations
- Audit framework design
- Executive briefing for election officials
- — Certification testing under any federal or state program
- — Election-day monitoring or incident response
- — Remediation by the equipment vendor
- — Public disclosure handling
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a readiness & governance assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping & framework selection
The standard or regulation, the systems and the business units in scope are fixed.
You see · Your audit or regulatory driver.
02Evidence collection & interviews
Policies, configurations and records reviewed; control owners interviewed.
You see · Documents and time with control owners.
03Gap analysis
Each requirement mapped to current state: met, partial or missing, with the evidence behind it.
You see · A clear gap register.
04Roadmap & evidence plan
Prioritized remediation with owners, and the evidence an auditor will ask for.
You see · A plan you can execute or hand to us.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Continuous Attack Surface Monitoring
Comprehensive continuous monitoring of your external attack surface with regular assessments and testing.
Active Directory Security Assessment
Comprehensive security assessment of Active Directory infrastructure, focusing on privilege escalation, lateral movement, and domain compromise scenarios.
Business Continuity Planning Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's business continuity capabilities and operational resilience through detailed Business Impact Analysis (BIA), risk assessment, and continuity planning. Our specialized approach combines regulatory compliance requirements with practical business resilience strategies to ensure your organization can maintain critical operations during disruptions and recover effectively from various business interruption scenarios.
Research
Latest from the blog

ciso-strategy · Sep 24, 2026
Brinqa-PlexTrac and Cribl-Radiant Deals Signal CTEM and SOC Platforms Are Absorbing Point Tools
Thirty-three cybersecurity M&A deals in August 2026, led by Brinqa-PlexTrac and Cribl-Radiant Security, show exposure management and SOC platforms swallowing offensive-security and AI-native automation tools.

risk-management · Sep 23, 2026
Three Linux Kernel Flaws Hit CISA's KEV List: A CISO Triage Playbook
CISA added three actively exploited Linux kernel CVEs to its KEV catalog with a 72-hour federal remediation window. Here is a step-by-step triage order for CISOs.

incident-response · Sep 22, 2026
The Revolut Breach Is a Case Study in Confusing Authentication With Authorization
Revolut disclosed customer data to attackers who spoofed a government agency's email domain for five months. The root cause was not weak email security but a workflow that treated a valid domain as proof of a valid request.
Start an engagement