Malware Analysis Services
Specialized security service providing in-depth analysis of suspected malware to understand capabilities, behavior, and impact. Our expert analysis combines static, dynamic, and memory forensics techniques to identify indicators of compromise, attribution details, and remediation strategies.
In scope
- Static code analysis
- Dynamic behavior analysis
- Memory forensics
- Network traffic analysis
- Anti-analysis technique identification
- Exploit mechanism review
- C2 infrastructure analysis
- Attribution assessment
You receive
- Detailed malware analysis report
- Indicators of compromise (IOCs)
- MITRE ATT&CK mapping
- Tactical remediation guidance
- Strategic defense recommendations
- Detection rule development
- Threat actor profile
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Malware Analysis
$30K
Analysis of one malware family, up to 3 related samples: static and sandboxed dynamic analysis, capability summary, network and host IOCs, and MITRE ATT&CK mapping. One host memory image. 80 analyst hours.
- devices
- 1
- hours
- 80
- Static and dynamic analysis of up to 3 samples
- Memory analysis of 1 host image
- IOC list (hashes, domains, IPs, file and registry artifacts)
- MITRE ATT&CK mapping
- Tactical remediation guidance
- — Full reverse engineering of packed or obfuscated code
- — Custom detection rule development
- — C2 infrastructure and attribution analysis
- — Incident response on affected systems
Advanced Malware Investigation
$50K
Up to 10 samples across up to 2 families with code-level reverse engineering, anti-analysis and exploit mechanism review, C2 protocol analysis, complete IOC set, and custom detection rules. Up to 3 host memory images. 140 analyst hours.
- devices
- 3
- hours
- 140
- Everything in the basic tier
- Code-level reverse engineering including unpacking
- Anti-analysis and exploit mechanism review
- C2 protocol and infrastructure analysis
- Custom host and network detection rules
- — Campaign-wide analysis across the environment
- — Threat actor profile
- — Enterprise-wide detection rollout strategy
Incident-Based Malware Response
$85K
Malware work tied to an active or recent incident: up to 25 samples, memory and network captures from up to 10 hosts, campaign timeline, threat actor profile, and a detection strategy for the whole environment. 240 analyst hours.
- devices
- 10
- hours
- 240
- Everything in the advanced tier
- Campaign analysis linking samples, hosts and infrastructure
- Threat actor profile and attribution assessment
- Enterprise-wide detection and hunting strategy
- Briefings for the incident response team
- — Containment, eradication and system rebuilds
- — Full disk forensics of every affected host
- — Expert witness testimony
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a incident response readiness engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Current-state review
Plans, playbooks, contacts, logging and insurance requirements reviewed.
You see · Your IR plan and insurance policy.
02Scenario design
Scenarios chosen for your threat profile: ransomware, BEC, insider, cloud compromise.
You see · Participant list and scenario sign-off.
03Exercise / readiness work
Tabletop facilitation or readiness build-out, depending on the service.
You see · Your team's time in the room.
04After-action report
Gaps found, decisions that stalled, and an improvement plan with owners.
You see · A report your board and insurer can read.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Incident Response Readiness & Tabletop Exercise
Comprehensive incident response assessment and tabletop exercise designed to validate your organization's IR preparedness through focused policy review, stakeholder coordination validation, and scenario-based team exercises. Our specialized approach combines industry-standard IR maturity assessment with practical tabletop simulations to enhance your incident response capabilities, team coordination, and regulatory compliance readiness.
SOC Maturity & Incident Response Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's Security Operations Center (SOC) capabilities and incident response readiness. Our assessment examines detection coverage, response procedures, team capabilities, and technology effectiveness to identify gaps in your security operations and provide a roadmap for enhanced threat detection and response capabilities.
Advanced Threat Hunting Program
Proactive threat hunting service combining machine learning, behavioral analytics, and expert analysis to identify sophisticated threats and establish continuous hunting capabilities.
Research
Latest from the blog
cloud-security · Sep 6, 2026
GPUThor and the Unpatchable Layer: When Your AI Infrastructure Risk Is Silicon, Not Software
University of Toronto researchers demonstrated a Rowhammer attack that defeats on-die ECC on NVIDIA workstation GPUs and reaches host root in about 1.1 minutes, down from roughly 22 hours. No software patch is possible, and the proof of concept is scheduled for November 15. Paired with NVIDIA's NemoClaw DNS-rebinding flaw, it defines the hardware boundary of AI infrastructure risk.
application-security · Sep 3, 2026
GitSpawn: Cloning a Repository Is Now Code Execution, and Four of Eight Findings Are Still Unpatched
Manifold Security disclosed a vulnerability class where a malicious .git/config file executes attacker commands the moment an AI coding agent runs a routine Git operation — no sandbox, no approval prompt, full developer privileges. Eight findings across seven agents including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and Goose. As of the September 1 retest, four remained unpatched.
supply-chain-security · Sep 2, 2026
Your MCP Servers Are Unreviewed Third-Party Code With Your Credentials: Deadbugz, Grafana, and the Registry Trust Gap
A malicious MCP server pushed through 23 GitHub pull requests in 74 minutes behaved normally for three calls, then rewrote its own instructions to exfiltrate SSH keys. Grafana's official MCP server accepted session IDs it never issued, at 1.9 million Docker pulls. MCP servers are third-party code running with your credentials, and almost nobody is governing them that way.
Start an engagement