NFT Asset Recovery & Analysis
Specialized service for recovering compromised or lost NFT assets and analyzing NFT-related smart contracts for security vulnerabilities.
In scope
- NFT ownership history
- Smart contract interactions
- Marketplace transactions
- Transfer patterns
- Wallet security
- Gas optimization
- Marketplace integration
You receive
- NFT recovery assessment
- Smart contract audit report
- Security vulnerability analysis
- Recovery action plan
- Marketplace security review
- Future protection strategy
- NFT management best practices
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Core NFT Recovery
$2,800
One wallet on one chain, up to 5 NFTs: ownership history verification, transfer tracing on one marketplace, review of 1 smart contract interaction, and a recovery action plan. 15 analyst hours.
- wallets
- 1
- hours
- 15
- Ownership history for up to 5 NFTs
- Transfer tracing on 1 chain and 1 marketplace
- Review of 1 contract interaction (approvals, malicious signatures)
- Recovery action plan with marketplace report templates
- Wallet security recommendations
- — Cross-chain or bridge tracing
- — Line-by-line smart contract audit
- — Any guarantee that assets are recovered
- — Legal action or law-enforcement filing on the client's behalf
Advanced NFT Recovery
$5.5K
Up to 3 wallets and up to 25 NFTs across up to 2 chains: cross-chain tracking, investigation on up to 3 marketplaces, and vulnerability analysis of up to 3 smart contracts. 30 analyst hours.
- wallets
- 3
- hours
- 30
- Everything in the basic tier
- Cross-chain tracking across up to 2 chains
- Investigation on up to 3 marketplaces
- Vulnerability analysis of up to 3 contracts
- Evidence package for marketplace and exchange reports
- — Chain forensics through mixers or many-hop laundering
- — Marketplace integration security audit
- — Any guarantee that assets are recovered
Premium NFT Recovery
$9.5K
Up to 10 wallets across up to 4 chains: end-to-end chain forensics of the stolen assets, custom contract analysis scripts, audit of up to 5 contracts, and a security review of the client's marketplace integration. 50 analyst hours.
- wallets
- 10
- hours
- 50
- Everything in the advanced tier
- End-to-end chain forensics with flow diagrams
- Custom contract analysis scripts
- Audit report on up to 5 contracts
- Marketplace integration security review
- Future protection strategy
- — Any guarantee that assets are recovered
- — Legal representation or court filings
- — Ongoing wallet monitoring after delivery
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a incident response readiness engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Current-state review
Plans, playbooks, contacts, logging and insurance requirements reviewed.
You see · Your IR plan and insurance policy.
02Scenario design
Scenarios chosen for your threat profile: ransomware, BEC, insider, cloud compromise.
You see · Participant list and scenario sign-off.
03Exercise / readiness work
Tabletop facilitation or readiness build-out, depending on the service.
You see · Your team's time in the room.
04After-action report
Gaps found, decisions that stalled, and an improvement plan with owners.
You see · A report your board and insurer can read.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Incident Response Readiness & Tabletop Exercise
Comprehensive incident response assessment and tabletop exercise designed to validate your organization's IR preparedness through focused policy review, stakeholder coordination validation, and scenario-based team exercises. Our specialized approach combines industry-standard IR maturity assessment with practical tabletop simulations to enhance your incident response capabilities, team coordination, and regulatory compliance readiness.
SOC Maturity & Incident Response Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's Security Operations Center (SOC) capabilities and incident response readiness. Our assessment examines detection coverage, response procedures, team capabilities, and technology effectiveness to identify gaps in your security operations and provide a roadmap for enhanced threat detection and response capabilities.
Advanced Threat Hunting Program
Proactive threat hunting service combining machine learning, behavioral analytics, and expert analysis to identify sophisticated threats and establish continuous hunting capabilities.
Research
Latest from the blog
cloud-security · Sep 6, 2026
GPUThor and the Unpatchable Layer: When Your AI Infrastructure Risk Is Silicon, Not Software
University of Toronto researchers demonstrated a Rowhammer attack that defeats on-die ECC on NVIDIA workstation GPUs and reaches host root in about 1.1 minutes, down from roughly 22 hours. No software patch is possible, and the proof of concept is scheduled for November 15. Paired with NVIDIA's NemoClaw DNS-rebinding flaw, it defines the hardware boundary of AI infrastructure risk.
application-security · Sep 3, 2026
GitSpawn: Cloning a Repository Is Now Code Execution, and Four of Eight Findings Are Still Unpatched
Manifold Security disclosed a vulnerability class where a malicious .git/config file executes attacker commands the moment an AI coding agent runs a routine Git operation — no sandbox, no approval prompt, full developer privileges. Eight findings across seven agents including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and Goose. As of the September 1 retest, four remained unpatched.
supply-chain-security · Sep 2, 2026
Your MCP Servers Are Unreviewed Third-Party Code With Your Credentials: Deadbugz, Grafana, and the Registry Trust Gap
A malicious MCP server pushed through 23 GitHub pull requests in 74 minutes behaved normally for three calls, then rewrote its own instructions to exfiltrate SSH keys. Grafana's official MCP server accepted session IDs it never issued, at 1.9 million Docker pulls. MCP servers are third-party code running with your credentials, and almost nobody is governing them that way.
Start an engagement