Oil & Gas Cybersecurity Assessment
Specialized security assessment for oil and gas operations, addressing the unique challenges of securing upstream, midstream, and downstream operations. Our comprehensive evaluation examines operational technology, SCADA systems, field devices, and IT/OT convergence points while ensuring compliance with industry regulations and standards.
In scope
- OT/ICS security assessment
- SCADA system security evaluation
- Field device security review
- Pipeline monitoring system security
- Refinery control system assessment
- IT/OT convergence security
- Physical security integration
- Regulatory compliance verification
- Third-party risk assessment
- Incident response capability
You receive
- Oil & gas security assessment report
- OT/ICS security recommendations
- SCADA protection strategy
- Field device security framework
- IT/OT segmentation architecture
- Regulatory compliance roadmap
- Physical-cyber security integration plan
- Critical infrastructure protection strategy
- Implementation prioritization
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Oil & Gas Security Assessment
$52K
Assessment of 1 operating site in one segment: OT/ICS and SCADA security evaluation, field device review on a sample of up to 25 devices, IT/OT boundary review, incident response capability check, and review against 1 regulatory standard.
- Sites
- 1
- devices
- 25
- frameworks
- 1
- OT/ICS and SCADA security evaluation at 1 site
- Field device security review, sample of up to 25 devices
- IT/OT convergence point review
- Incident response capability check
- Regulatory review against 1 standard
- Report with implementation prioritization
- — Pipeline monitoring and refinery control system deep-dives
- — IT/OT segmentation architecture design
- — Physical security integration
- — Third-party risk assessment
Comprehensive Oil & Gas Security Program
$95K
Assessment of up to 3 sites across up to 2 segments, up to 75 field devices sampled. Adds pipeline monitoring and refinery control system assessment, IT/OT segmentation architecture, SCADA protection strategy, physical security integration, third-party risk, and a compliance roadmap.
- Sites
- 3
- devices
- 75
- frameworks
- 2
- vendors
- 10
- Everything in the Essential tier, for up to 3 sites
- Pipeline monitoring and refinery control system assessment
- IT/OT segmentation architecture
- SCADA protection strategy
- Physical-cyber security integration plan
- Third-party risk assessment of up to 10 vendors
- — Implementation support
- — Security governance model
- — More than 3 sites
Enterprise Energy Security Transformation
$150K
Full-spectrum security program for large energy operations with custom architecture, implementation support, and governance
- Sites
- 5
- devices
- 200
- frameworks
- 3
- vendors
- 25
- — Remediation hardware and licences
- — Operations above 5 sites (scoped separately)
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Blockchain Contact Analysis Service
In-depth analysis of blockchain contacts and transactions to trace asset movement, identify patterns, and assess security risks in cryptocurrency operations.
Quantum-Safe Cryptography Readiness
Future-proof your cryptographic infrastructure with quantum-safe algorithms and protocols. Includes assessment, migration planning, and implementation support.
Banking and Web3 Redundancy Assessment
Advanced assessment of banking and Web3 infrastructure focusing on redundancy, privacy, and security measures for cryptocurrency and traditional banking operations.
Research
Latest from the blog

ciso-strategy · Sep 24, 2026
Brinqa-PlexTrac and Cribl-Radiant Deals Signal CTEM and SOC Platforms Are Absorbing Point Tools
Thirty-three cybersecurity M&A deals in August 2026, led by Brinqa-PlexTrac and Cribl-Radiant Security, show exposure management and SOC platforms swallowing offensive-security and AI-native automation tools.

risk-management · Sep 23, 2026
Three Linux Kernel Flaws Hit CISA's KEV List: A CISO Triage Playbook
CISA added three actively exploited Linux kernel CVEs to its KEV catalog with a 72-hour federal remediation window. Here is a step-by-step triage order for CISOs.

incident-response · Sep 22, 2026
The Revolut Breach Is a Case Study in Confusing Authentication With Authorization
Revolut disclosed customer data to attackers who spoofed a government agency's email domain for five months. The root cause was not weak email security but a workflow that treated a valid domain as proof of a valid request.
Start an engagement