Privacy Engineering & Data Protection Program
Comprehensive service to implement privacy by design principles and data protection controls throughout your organization's systems and processes. Our program helps you architect privacy-enhancing technologies, implement data minimization strategies, and establish technical privacy controls that align with regulatory requirements while enhancing user trust.
In scope
- Privacy by design implementation
- Data flow analysis
- Privacy impact assessment methodology
- Privacy-enhancing technology evaluation
- Data minimization strategy
- Privacy control implementation
- Cross-border data transfer assessment
- Anonymization and pseudonymization techniques
- Data subject rights technical implementation
- Privacy monitoring framework
You receive
- Privacy engineering roadmap
- Technical privacy controls framework
- Data protection architecture
- Privacy-enhanced system design recommendations
- Data minimization implementation plan
- Technical controls documentation
- Privacy monitoring and metrics
- Privacy governance framework
- Data lifecycle management strategy
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Privacy Engineering Assessment
$45K
Privacy engineering review for up to 250 employees: data flow analysis of up to 3 systems, 1 regulation in scope, data minimization review, privacy-by-design recommendations, and implementation guidance for up to 5 priority controls.
- employees
- 250
- frameworks
- 1
- Data flow analysis of up to 3 systems
- Review against 1 privacy regulation
- Data minimization strategy
- Privacy-enhanced design recommendations
- Implementation guidance for up to 5 technical controls
- Privacy engineering roadmap
- — PIA methodology and templates
- — Privacy-enhancing technology evaluation
- — Data subject rights automation
- — Monitoring and metrics
Comprehensive Privacy Engineering Program
$75K
Program for up to 1,000 employees: up to 8 systems and up to 2 regulations. Adds privacy impact assessment methodology, privacy-enhancing technology evaluation, anonymization/pseudonymization design, data subject rights technical implementation, and a privacy monitoring framework.
- employees
- 1000
- frameworks
- 2
- Everything in the Essential tier, for up to 8 systems
- Privacy impact assessment methodology and templates
- Privacy-enhancing technology evaluation
- Anonymization and pseudonymization design
- Data subject rights technical implementation design
- Privacy monitoring framework and metrics
- — Organization-wide data protection architecture
- — Cross-border transfer assessment
- — Hands-on implementation support
- — Governance framework
Enterprise Privacy Architecture Transformation
$120K
Advanced privacy engineering program with comprehensive data protection architecture, implementation support, and governance framework
- frameworks
- 4
- — Legal advice and DPO services
- — Privacy tooling licences
- — More than 15 systems (scoped separately)
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Blockchain Contact Analysis Service
In-depth analysis of blockchain contacts and transactions to trace asset movement, identify patterns, and assess security risks in cryptocurrency operations.
Quantum-Safe Cryptography Readiness
Future-proof your cryptographic infrastructure with quantum-safe algorithms and protocols. Includes assessment, migration planning, and implementation support.
Banking and Web3 Redundancy Assessment
Advanced assessment of banking and Web3 infrastructure focusing on redundancy, privacy, and security measures for cryptocurrency and traditional banking operations.
Research
Latest from the blog
incident-response · Sep 22, 2026
The Revolut Breach Is a Case Study in Confusing Authentication With Authorization
Revolut disclosed customer data to attackers who spoofed a government agency's email domain for five months. The root cause was not weak email security but a workflow that treated a valid domain as proof of a valid request.
ai-security · Sep 5, 2026
Excessive Agency Moved to #3: What the 2026 OWASP LLM Top 10 and the Agent Control Standard Change For Your Program
The OWASP GenAI Security Project's 2026 list weighted 6,639 real incidents against expert consensus, and the largest movement on it was Excessive Agency climbing from #6 to #3. Alongside it shipped the Agent Control Standard v0.1, which defines agent governance through OpenTelemetry and OCSF tracing. The ranking is a lagging indicator finally catching up to what is actually breaking.
threat-intelligence · Sep 1, 2026
The Coding Agent Is the Intrusion Tool: Aurora Ransomware, Cursor, and the End of "AI Writes Malware" as the Threat Model
Between April and May 2026, an Aurora ransomware affiliate did not ask an AI to write malware. It pointed a commercial coding agent at live victim networks and had it perform reconnaissance, credential theft, and Active Directory escalation against at least ten organizations — roughly 30-50% faster than the same operator working alone. The safety bypass was one word: "test."
Start an engagement