Secure Code Review
Comprehensive analysis of application source code to identify security vulnerabilities, coding flaws, and implementation issues that could lead to security breaches. Our expert review combines automated scanning with manual expert analysis.
In scope
- Manual code review
- Automated static analysis
- Business logic review
- Third-party component analysis
- Security control assessment
- Secure coding practices evaluation
You receive
- Detailed vulnerability report
- Code-level remediation guidance
- Risk prioritization
- Secure coding best practices
- Software composition analysis
- Secure development training recommendations
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Code Review
$35K
Review of the security-critical components of 1 application: up to 2 repositories and up to 100,000 lines of code. Automated static analysis of the whole codebase, manual review limited to auth, session, input handling and crypto.
- repositories
- 2
- 1 application, up to 2 repositories, up to 100k LOC
- Automated static analysis of all code
- Manual review of auth, session, input and crypto code
- Vulnerability report with code-level fixes
- — Manual review of the full codebase
- — Business logic review
- — Software composition analysis of all dependencies
- — Developer training
Comprehensive Code Security Assessment
$65K
Whole-codebase review of 1 application: up to 5 repositories and up to 500,000 lines of code. Manual review of all modules, business logic review, software composition analysis and a remediation plan.
- repositories
- 5
- 1 application, up to 5 repositories, up to 500k LOC
- Manual review across all modules
- Business logic review
- Software composition analysis
- Prioritized remediation plan
- — Secure SDLC process design
- — Custom static-analysis rules
- — Developer training delivery
- — Fixing the code
Enterprise Secure SDLC Program
$95K
Code review of up to 3 applications and up to 15 repositories, plus secure SDLC design, custom static-analysis rules wired into your pipeline and secure-coding training for up to 50 developers. Lines of code scoped at kickoff.
- repositories
- 15
- developers
- 50
- Up to 3 applications, up to 15 repositories
- Secure SDLC process design and rollout plan
- Custom static-analysis rules in your pipeline
- Secure-coding training for up to 50 developers
- Software composition analysis
- — Fixing the code
- — Ongoing review of new commits
- — Dynamic/penetration testing of running apps
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a application, api & code testing engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping & threat model
Roles, key workflows, integrations and the data that matters are mapped before testing.
You see · Architecture overview and test accounts.
02Authenticated testing
Manual testing against OWASP WSTG / ASVS / MASVS / API Top 10: authorization, business logic, injection, session handling.
You see · A heads-up on any confirmed critical.
03Business-logic abuse
The flaws scanners can't find: broken object-level authorization, workflow bypasses, pricing and entitlement abuse.
You see · Findings in your application's own terms.
04Reporting
Each finding with severity, request/response evidence, reproduction steps and a code-level fix.
You see · A report developers can act on.
05Retest
Fixes verified and the report reissued, where the tier includes it.
You see · An attestation you can share with customers.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
DevSecOps Pipeline Testing
Comprehensive security testing integrated into your development pipeline with regular assessments.
Cloud Security Monitoring
Continuous monitoring and assessment of your cloud infrastructure security posture.
Cloud Security Posture Management
Advanced cloud security assessment and continuous monitoring implementation across multi-cloud environments, focusing on compliance, cost optimization, and security automation.
Research
Latest from the blog
incident-response · Sep 16, 2026
Root RCE Zero-Day in Cisco Secure Email Gateway Under Active Exploitation
A critical, unauthenticated root RCE flaw in Cisco Secure Email Gateway is under active exploitation, added to CISA's KEV catalog with a September 17 federal deadline.
operations · Sep 7, 2026
The Management Plane Had a Bad Week: N-able, MikroTik, Coder, PaperCut, and the Software That Is Trusted By Default
A CVSS 10.0 in N-able N-central with roughly 1,500 servers exposed and a confirmed compromise two days before the hotfix. Router takeover without credentials. A developer registry hijacked for 14 hours to serve credential-stealing Terraform modules to Dropbox, Palantir and government customers. An unpatched EDR privilege escalation. None of it involved AI, and all of it involved software your controls trust implicitly.
application-security · Sep 3, 2026
GitSpawn: Cloning a Repository Is Now Code Execution, and Four of Eight Findings Are Still Unpatched
Manifold Security disclosed a vulnerability class where a malicious .git/config file executes attacker commands the moment an AI coding agent runs a routine Git operation — no sandbox, no approval prompt, full developer privileges. Eight findings across seven agents including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and Goose. As of the September 1 retest, four remained unpatched.
Start an engagement