Security Awareness Program Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's security awareness and training initiatives, measuring effectiveness, cultural impact, and behavior change. Our assessment identifies gaps in your human security controls and provides a strategic roadmap for creating a security-conscious workforce that actively defends against social engineering and other human-targeted attacks.
In scope
- Training content evaluation
- Awareness program effectiveness
- Phishing simulation results analysis
- Security culture assessment
- Behavior change measurement
- Training delivery methods
- Executive engagement review
- Compliance training adequacy
You receive
- Security awareness program report
- Gap analysis and recommendations
- Phishing simulation plan
- Training content enhancement strategy
- Security culture development roadmap
- Metrics and measurement framework
- Role-based training recommendations
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Security Awareness Review
$28K
Assessment of the awareness program for up to 500 staff.
- employees
- 500
- Program and content review
- Metrics baseline
- Improvement plan
- — Running simulations for you
Comprehensive Awareness Program Development
$48K
Up to 2,000 staff, including a measured simulation and role-based gap analysis.
- employees
- 2000
- Measured simulation
- Role-based gap analysis
- — Ongoing program operation
Enterprise Security Culture Program
$75K
Up to 10,000 staff across regions; larger organizations are scoped at kickoff.
- employees
- 10000
- Multi-region program review
- Executive and board reporting design
- — Ongoing program operation — see Managed Security Awareness
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a social engineering & physical engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping & authorization
Targets, pretexts, sites and legal authorization letters agreed before anything is sent or attempted.
You see · Signed authorization and approved pretexts.
02OSINT & pretext design
Public information on staff and sites is used to build believable pretexts.
You see · Approval of the pretexts.
03Campaign / on-site execution
Phishing, vishing or physical entry attempts, run to the agreed plan and stopped on request.
You see · Real-time escalation if anything goes wrong.
04Reporting & awareness debrief
What worked, who reported it, and the controls that failed, without naming and shaming individuals.
You see · Metrics and a training plan.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Red Team Subscription
A standing offensive testing program in place of a once-a-year engagement. Each month our team runs a targeted assessment against an agreed part of your environment; each quarter a scenario-based attack tests how well your people and tooling detect and respond. The Premium tier adds two full red team engagements a year. Findings from every cycle feed one running improvement plan, so each round also checks whether the last round's fixes held. Targets, rules of engagement and testing windows are agreed at kickoff.
AI & Agentic Red Team
Offensive testing of LLMs and AI agents — prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse, agent goal hijack, memory/context poisoning, model extraction, and agent identity abuse. Mapped to OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS.
AI/ML Security Assessment
Expert evaluation of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems security, from model development to deployment. Our assessment identifies vulnerabilities in AI/ML infrastructure, examines risks of data poisoning, adversarial attacks, and model manipulation while providing guidance for securing these advanced technologies.
Research
Latest from the blog
ai-security · Feb 10, 2026
The Deepfake Dividend: How AI Has Industrialized Social Engineering — And Why Your Defenses Are Obsolete
AI-generated voice clones cost $5 and take 3 seconds to create. Deepfake-assisted fraud exceeded $12 billion in losses in 2025. Your security awareness training was built for Nigerian prince emails, not real-time video impersonation of your CFO. Here's the CISO's playbook for the new reality.
ai-security · Aug 16, 2024
Introducing Cyber Compass GPT: Your AI-Powered Ally in Quizzes, Cybersecurity Education, and Certification
As the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve, professionals at all levels—from students to seasoned CISOs—need a reliable and adaptive resource to stay ah...
operations · Aug 5, 2024
Building a Cybersecurity Culture
In today's rapidly evolving threat landscape, fostering a cybersecurity-aware culture within organizations is more crucial than ever.
Start an engagement