Smart City Infrastructure Assessment
Comprehensive security evaluation of smart city technologies, including traffic systems, surveillance networks, and municipal IoT deployments.
In scope
- Traffic control system testing
- Smart lighting security review
- Municipal IoT device assessment
- Emergency response system testing
- Public WiFi security evaluation
- Surveillance system security review
- Cross-system integration testing
- Municipal service platform and data-integration security
- Security architecture review (top tier)
You receive
- Smart city security report
- Critical vulnerability assessment
- Integration security analysis
- Public safety impact analysis
- Privacy protection recommendations
- Remediation strategy guide
- 120-day follow-up assessment
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Core Infrastructure Assessment
$45K
Two system types - traffic control and emergency response - in 1 municipality: security testing of each with up to 25 field devices sampled, critical vulnerability assessment and public safety impact analysis. Includes a follow-up review.
- Sites
- 1
- devices
- 25
- Traffic control system testing
- Emergency response system testing
- Up to 25 field devices sampled
- Public safety impact analysis
- 120-day follow-up assessment
- — Smart lighting, public WiFi and surveillance systems
- — Cross-system integration testing
- — Privacy impact analysis
- — Reassessments
Comprehensive Infrastructure Assessment
$75K
All six system types in 1 municipality with up to 100 devices sampled: adds smart lighting, municipal IoT, public WiFi and surveillance, cross-system integration testing and privacy impact analysis. Includes a follow-up review.
- Sites
- 1
- devices
- 100
- All six system types
- Up to 100 devices sampled
- Cross-system integration testing
- Privacy impact analysis
- Remediation strategy guide
- 120-day follow-up assessment
- — Quarterly reassessment
- — Monitoring after the assessment
- — Device samples above 100
Enterprise Infrastructure Assessment
$95K
Complete smart city security program including all systems, extended monitoring, and quarterly reassessment
- Sites
- 1
- devices
- 250
- sessions
- 4
- — Remediation work
- — Additional municipalities
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Blockchain Contact Analysis Service
In-depth analysis of blockchain contacts and transactions to trace asset movement, identify patterns, and assess security risks in cryptocurrency operations.
Quantum-Safe Cryptography Readiness
Future-proof your cryptographic infrastructure with quantum-safe algorithms and protocols. Includes assessment, migration planning, and implementation support.
Banking and Web3 Redundancy Assessment
Advanced assessment of banking and Web3 infrastructure focusing on redundancy, privacy, and security measures for cryptocurrency and traditional banking operations.
Research
Latest from the blog
cloud-security · Sep 6, 2026
GPUThor and the Unpatchable Layer: When Your AI Infrastructure Risk Is Silicon, Not Software
University of Toronto researchers demonstrated a Rowhammer attack that defeats on-die ECC on NVIDIA workstation GPUs and reaches host root in about 1.1 minutes, down from roughly 22 hours. No software patch is possible, and the proof of concept is scheduled for November 15. Paired with NVIDIA's NemoClaw DNS-rebinding flaw, it defines the hardware boundary of AI infrastructure risk.
compliance · Aug 29, 2026
Inside the U.S. Cyber Trust Mark: Who Actually Certifies Your Smart Doorbell
The FCC's IoT label program has been announced so many times that most people assume it already exists. It doesn't — no CyberLAB has been recognized and no product applications are open. What does exist is the full accreditation stack: ISO/IEC 17011 to 17065 to 17025, ioXt as lead administrator, and a registry support-period field that is the most useful procurement artifact this program will produce.
operations · Aug 25, 2026
A Tale of Two SOCs: CISA Ran the Same Attack Against Two Organizations. One Caught It in Two Minutes. One Never Saw It.
CISA advisory AA26-237A, published August 25, 2026, documents red team assessments against two critical infrastructure organizations using comparable tradecraft. Organization B isolated hosts in 2 to 20 minutes. Organization A was fully compromised — domain, cloud, and the security team's own communications — and detected nothing. CISA attributes the gap to people and process, not tooling. That finding should change how you spend.
Start an engagement