Social Engineering Campaign Assessment
Comprehensive social engineering assessment including phishing campaigns, vishing attacks, physical security testing, and employee awareness evaluation.
In scope
- Phishing campaign development
- Vishing attack scenarios
- Physical security tests
- Employee awareness evaluation
- Access control testing
- Removable-media and tailgating exercises (upper tiers)
- Training session for the groups that responded (upper tiers)
You receive
- Campaign effectiveness report
- Employee vulnerability analysis
- Security awareness recommendations
- Training program design
- Response procedure assessment
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Entry — market-sized scope
$7.5K
One email-only exercise for up to 100 staff with a results report. The smallest version of this work.
- employees
- 100
- Objectives
- 1
- One email exercise
- Results by department
- Awareness recommendations
- — Phone-based and on-site exercises
- — Follow-up training
Core Social Engineering Assessment
$25K
Email exercises for up to 500 staff: 2 campaigns plus an awareness baseline.
- employees
- 500
- Objectives
- 2
- Two email campaigns
- Awareness baseline
- Executive summary
- — Phone-based and on-site exercises
Advanced Social Engineering Program
$45K
Email and phone exercises for up to 2,000 staff, plus on-site testing at one location.
- employees
- 2000
- Objectives
- 4
- Sites
- 1
- Email and phone exercises
- On-site testing at one location
- Targeted coaching for repeat responders
- — More than one on-site location
Enterprise Social Engineering Solution
$75K
All channels for up to 5,000 staff, on-site testing at up to 3 locations and a follow-up awareness program.
- employees
- 5000
- Objectives
- 8
- Sites
- 3
- All channels
- Up to three on-site locations
- Follow-up awareness program
- — Ongoing monthly simulations — see Managed Security Awareness
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a social engineering & physical engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping & authorization
Targets, pretexts, sites and legal authorization letters agreed before anything is sent or attempted.
You see · Signed authorization and approved pretexts.
02OSINT & pretext design
Public information on staff and sites is used to build believable pretexts.
You see · Approval of the pretexts.
03Campaign / on-site execution
Phishing, vishing or physical entry attempts, run to the agreed plan and stopped on request.
You see · Real-time escalation if anything goes wrong.
04Reporting & awareness debrief
What worked, who reported it, and the controls that failed, without naming and shaming individuals.
You see · Metrics and a training plan.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Red Team Subscription
A standing offensive testing program in place of a once-a-year engagement. Each month our team runs a targeted assessment against an agreed part of your environment; each quarter a scenario-based attack tests how well your people and tooling detect and respond. The Premium tier adds two full red team engagements a year. Findings from every cycle feed one running improvement plan, so each round also checks whether the last round's fixes held. Targets, rules of engagement and testing windows are agreed at kickoff.
AI & Agentic Red Team
Offensive testing of LLMs and AI agents — prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse, agent goal hijack, memory/context poisoning, model extraction, and agent identity abuse. Mapped to OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS.
AI/ML Security Assessment
Expert evaluation of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems security, from model development to deployment. Our assessment identifies vulnerabilities in AI/ML infrastructure, examines risks of data poisoning, adversarial attacks, and model manipulation while providing guidance for securing these advanced technologies.
Research
Latest from the blog
incident-response · Sep 22, 2026
The Revolut Breach Is a Case Study in Confusing Authentication With Authorization
Revolut disclosed customer data to attackers who spoofed a government agency's email domain for five months. The root cause was not weak email security but a workflow that treated a valid domain as proof of a valid request.
ai-security · Sep 5, 2026
Excessive Agency Moved to #3: What the 2026 OWASP LLM Top 10 and the Agent Control Standard Change For Your Program
The OWASP GenAI Security Project's 2026 list weighted 6,639 real incidents against expert consensus, and the largest movement on it was Excessive Agency climbing from #6 to #3. Alongside it shipped the Agent Control Standard v0.1, which defines agent governance through OpenTelemetry and OCSF tracing. The ranking is a lagging indicator finally catching up to what is actually breaking.
threat-intelligence · Sep 1, 2026
The Coding Agent Is the Intrusion Tool: Aurora Ransomware, Cursor, and the End of "AI Writes Malware" as the Threat Model
Between April and May 2026, an Aurora ransomware affiliate did not ask an AI to write malware. It pointed a commercial coding agent at live victim networks and had it perform reconnaissance, credential theft, and Active Directory escalation against at least ten organizations — roughly 30-50% faster than the same operator working alone. The safety bypass was one word: "test."
Start an engagement