Software Supply Chain Security Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's software supply chain security posture, examining third-party dependencies, build processes, and deployment pipelines. Our assessment identifies vulnerabilities in your software supply chain and provides strategies to mitigate risks from compromised components, malicious packages, and insecure development practices.
In scope
- Third-party dependency review
- Build pipeline security assessment
- Code signing practices
- Package repository security
- Provenance verification
- CI/CD security controls
- Container image security
- Dependency vulnerability management
- SBOM generation and management
- Artifact signing process evaluation
- Container and base-image security analysis
You receive
- Software supply chain risk assessment report
- Dependency security analysis
- Build pipeline security recommendations
- SBOM implementation strategy
- Code signing framework
- Repository security controls
- Vulnerability management process
- Regulatory compliance guidance
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Supply Chain Security Review
$36K
Up to 10 repositories, 1 CI/CD platform and up to 25 developers: third-party dependency review of critical applications, build pipeline and CI/CD control review, package repository settings, and code signing practices. Risk report.
- repositories
- 10
- developers
- 25
- Up to 10 repositories
- Dependency review of critical applications
- Build pipeline and CI/CD control review
- Package repository security review
- Code signing practice review
- Risk assessment report
- — SBOM generation and implementation
- — Container image security
- — Provenance verification
- — Governance framework
Comprehensive Supply Chain Security Program
$65K
Up to 25 repositories, up to 3 CI/CD platforms and up to 100 developers: all nine scope areas including container images and provenance verification, SBOMs generated for in-scope applications, and a dependency vulnerability management process.
- repositories
- 25
- developers
- 100
- Up to 25 repositories
- All nine scope areas
- SBOM generation and implementation strategy
- Container image security
- Provenance verification
- Vulnerability management process
- — Automated policy gates built into pipelines
- — Governance framework
- — Regulatory compliance mapping
Enterprise Supply Chain Security Framework
$95K
Up to 100 repositories and up to 250 developers: Standard scope plus automated controls (dependency, signing and SBOM gates) implemented in pipelines, a supply chain governance framework, and mapping to the customer's named regulatory requirements.
- repositories
- 100
- developers
- 250
- Up to 100 repositories
- Automated pipeline gates implemented
- Governance framework
- Code signing framework
- Regulatory compliance guidance
- — Tool licence costs
- — Ongoing managed monitoring
- — Application source code review for vulnerabilities
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Blockchain Contact Analysis Service
In-depth analysis of blockchain contacts and transactions to trace asset movement, identify patterns, and assess security risks in cryptocurrency operations.
Quantum-Safe Cryptography Readiness
Future-proof your cryptographic infrastructure with quantum-safe algorithms and protocols. Includes assessment, migration planning, and implementation support.
Banking and Web3 Redundancy Assessment
Advanced assessment of banking and Web3 infrastructure focusing on redundancy, privacy, and security measures for cryptocurrency and traditional banking operations.
Research
Latest from the blog
operations · Sep 7, 2026
The Management Plane Had a Bad Week: N-able, MikroTik, Coder, PaperCut, and the Software That Is Trusted By Default
A CVSS 10.0 in N-able N-central with roughly 1,500 servers exposed and a confirmed compromise two days before the hotfix. Router takeover without credentials. A developer registry hijacked for 14 hours to serve credential-stealing Terraform modules to Dropbox, Palantir and government customers. An unpatched EDR privilege escalation. None of it involved AI, and all of it involved software your controls trust implicitly.
cloud-security · Sep 6, 2026
GPUThor and the Unpatchable Layer: When Your AI Infrastructure Risk Is Silicon, Not Software
University of Toronto researchers demonstrated a Rowhammer attack that defeats on-die ECC on NVIDIA workstation GPUs and reaches host root in about 1.1 minutes, down from roughly 22 hours. No software patch is possible, and the proof of concept is scheduled for November 15. Paired with NVIDIA's NemoClaw DNS-rebinding flaw, it defines the hardware boundary of AI infrastructure risk.
supply-chain-security · Sep 2, 2026
Your MCP Servers Are Unreviewed Third-Party Code With Your Credentials: Deadbugz, Grafana, and the Registry Trust Gap
A malicious MCP server pushed through 23 GitHub pull requests in 74 minutes behaved normally for three calls, then rewrote its own instructions to exfiltrate SSH keys. Grafana's official MCP server accepted session IDs it never issued, at 1.9 million Docker pulls. MCP servers are third-party code running with your credentials, and almost nobody is governing them that way.
Start an engagement