Vulnerability Management Maturity Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation of your organization's vulnerability management program maturity, effectiveness, and integration with security operations. Our assessment examines scanning coverage, patch management processes, risk-based prioritization, and remediation workflows to identify program gaps and provide a roadmap for enhanced vulnerability risk reduction.
In scope
- Vulnerability scanning coverage assessment
- Patch management process evaluation
- Vulnerability prioritization methodology review
- Remediation workflow assessment
- Mean time to remediate analysis
- Vulnerability tracking process evaluation
- Risk acceptance process review
- False positive management assessment
- Asset inventory completeness evaluation
- Vulnerability management governance
- Tool effectiveness assessment
- Integration with development workflows
You receive
- Vulnerability management maturity report
- Program gap analysis
- Scanning coverage recommendations
- Prioritization framework optimization
- Remediation process enhancements
- MTTR improvement strategy
- Governance model recommendations
- Tool optimization guidance
- DevSecOps integration roadmap
- Metrics and KPI framework
- Implementation timeline
Tiers
Choose the depth.
Essential Vulnerability Program Assessment
$34K
Maturity assessment of a vulnerability management program covering up to 1,000 assets.
- devices
- 1000
- Sites
- 2
- Process and tooling review
- Maturity score
- Roadmap
- — Running the scans for you
Advanced Vulnerability Management Program
$60K
Up to 5,000 assets, including cloud, with SLA and metrics design.
- devices
- 5000
- Sites
- 5
- Cloud coverage
- SLA and metrics design
- — Tool implementation
Enterprise Vulnerability Program Transformation
$90K
Up to 25,000 assets across business units, with an operating model and tooling selection.
- devices
- 25000
- Sites
- 15
- Operating model
- Tooling selection support
- — Ongoing operation — see Vulnerability Management as a Service
Members: engagement coupons from the CISO Marketplace coupon book apply to services. There is no blanket discount.
What's inside this engagement
Phase by phase.
How a security assessment engagement runs, what happens in each phase and what you see. Exact scope, tier and timeline are fixed in your proposal and SOW.
01Scoping
Systems, sites, stakeholders and the question the assessment must answer.
You see · Your objectives and constraints.
02Discovery & evidence
Documents, configurations and interviews, plus technical testing where the service includes it.
You see · Access and time with key people.
03Analysis
Findings rated by risk to your business, not by a generic score.
You see · A prioritized view of your risk.
04Report & debrief
Executive summary, findings and a remediation roadmap, walked through with your team.
You see · The report and the debrief.
Commercials
From first call to final report.
- 01
Scoping call
A practitioner, not a salesperson, walks through targets, constraints and what a good outcome looks like for you.
- 02
Proposal & rules of engagement
A fixed-scope proposal with tier, price and deliverables. Rules of engagement, contacts and out-of-bounds systems are agreed in writing.
- 03
Sign, then start
MSA and SOW are signed electronically and the deposit is paid. Only then does testing begin.
- 04
Execution
Testing runs to the agreed plan. Critical findings are escalated as they are found; you don't wait for the report.
- 05
Report & debrief
An executive summary plus technical findings with evidence, reproduction steps and fixes, walked through with your team.
- 06
Retest
Where the tier includes it, we verify your fixes and reissue the report, so auditors and customers see the issues closed.
Timelines are set per engagement in the SOW.
Related
Red Team Subscription
A standing offensive testing program in place of a once-a-year engagement. Each month our team runs a targeted assessment against an agreed part of your environment; each quarter a scenario-based attack tests how well your people and tooling detect and respond. The Premium tier adds two full red team engagements a year. Findings from every cycle feed one running improvement plan, so each round also checks whether the last round's fixes held. Targets, rules of engagement and testing windows are agreed at kickoff.
AI & Agentic Red Team
Offensive testing of LLMs and AI agents — prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse, agent goal hijack, memory/context poisoning, model extraction, and agent identity abuse. Mapped to OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS.
AI/ML Security Assessment
Expert evaluation of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems security, from model development to deployment. Our assessment identifies vulnerabilities in AI/ML infrastructure, examines risks of data poisoning, adversarial attacks, and model manipulation while providing guidance for securing these advanced technologies.
Research
Latest from the blog
operations · Nov 4, 2026
From Bug Bounty to Bench: How Hall of Fame Tiers Feed Our Continuous Testing Flywheel
October brought 28 vulnerability reports from 8 researchers. Here is how our Hall of Fame tiers work, why Silver and Gold are gated on quality not volume, and how proven researchers move onto paid PTaaS and DevSecOps engagements.
incident-response · Nov 4, 2026
Critical Node-RED Flaw Under Active Exploitation: CVE-2026-58115 Hits Siemens Gateways
A maximum-severity authentication bypass in Node-RED is being exploited to drop Linux bots and webshells on Siemens SIMATIC IoT2050 gateways. VulnCheck says the exploit is trivial to weaponize.
ai-security · Nov 1, 2026
ARTEX Shows Agentic AI Supply Chains Are Now a Tier-One Attack Surface
A China-linked actor breached hundreds of organizations in hours using an agentic AI pentest framework, while new research shows tool poisoning and MCP flaws already run at CVE scale.
Start an engagement